castielcampbell:

emilianadarling:

IT GETS FUNNIER EVERY TIME.

RIGHT in the kisser

castielcampbell:

emilianadarling:

IT GETS FUNNIER EVERY TIME.

RIGHT in the kisser


liberteabel:

pixieneverland:

by 洋一

WHO SAID THIS WAS OKAY


lucyzephyr:

saucefactory:

OH, COULSON.

ARE YOU UNCOMFORTABLY AROUSED.

ARE YOU.

ARE YOU UNCOMFORTABLY AROUSED AND HATING YOURSELF.

ARE YOU.

will forever be the best thing to come out of this fandom


paigeallenyummm:

“this leaves men confused and unable to pigeonhole you. What they are forced to do instead is… take you seriously.”

Reblog every time


carry-on-my-wayward-butt:

thylara:

watch this commercial you won’t regret it

fuCKIN


Danny’s reaction to Stiles dropping his XXL condom


Destiny


supremeoutcast:

I strongly disagree with anyone who says Maleficent isn’t the best Disney villain. No singing, no dancing, no long expositions about her plans, no tolerance for bumbling comedy sidekicks (she electrocutes a whole room full of minions when she finds out they’ve fucked up and spent the last few years searching for a baby), just outright malicious intent.
I mean let’s take a look at her motivations compared to other popular Disney villains:SCAR - Wanted to become King. 
URSULA - Wanted to rule the seas.
WICKED QUEEN - Wanted to rule as the most beautiful woman in the land.
JAFAR - Wanted to rule in the Sultan’s place and/or obtain ultimate power.
Maleficient, by contrast, didn’t want any of that. She didn’t want more power. She didn’t want fame. She didn’t want to rule. She just wanted to raise hell. This is the woman who decided that every newborn child in the kingdom should die and that the land should be covered in darkness for one reason - SHE WASN’T INVITED TO A MOTHERFUCKING PARTY.
That’s right, the evil bitch basically condemned an entire kingdom to die at her hands because she didn’t get invited to a christening.
This is not a woman with a motivation. She cannot be reasoned with. Her actions cannot be rationalized. She is evil for the fun of being evil, not because she wants something.
THAT, my friends, is the ultimate villain. One who knows they’re evil and LOVES it. 

supremeoutcast:

I strongly disagree with anyone who says Maleficent isn’t the best Disney villain. No singing, no dancing, no long expositions about her plans, no tolerance for bumbling comedy sidekicks (she electrocutes a whole room full of minions when she finds out they’ve fucked up and spent the last few years searching for a baby), just outright malicious intent.

I mean let’s take a look at her motivations compared to other popular Disney villains:

SCAR - Wanted to become King. 

URSULA - Wanted to rule the seas.

WICKED QUEEN - Wanted to rule as the most beautiful woman in the land.

JAFAR - Wanted to rule in the Sultan’s place and/or obtain ultimate power.

Maleficient, by contrast, didn’t want any of that. She didn’t want more power. She didn’t want fame. She didn’t want to rule. She just wanted to raise hell. This is the woman who decided that every newborn child in the kingdom should die and that the land should be covered in darkness for one reason - SHE WASN’T INVITED TO A MOTHERFUCKING PARTY.

That’s right, the evil bitch basically condemned an entire kingdom to die at her hands because she didn’t get invited to a christening.

This is not a woman with a motivation. She cannot be reasoned with. Her actions cannot be rationalized. She is evil for the fun of being evil, not because she wants something.

THAT, my friends, is the ultimate villain. One who knows they’re evil and LOVES it. 


cypheroftyr:

katiebour:

surelyforth:

Pre-cursor to porn (because this ain’t gonna end in a sermon), Isabela/Sebastian/F!Hawke.
Isabela’s is the healthiest imagination.

**************
WAAAAANT

I second this emotion <3

cypheroftyr:

katiebour:

surelyforth:

Pre-cursor to porn (because this ain’t gonna end in a sermon), Isabela/Sebastian/F!Hawke.

Isabela’s is the healthiest imagination.

**************

WAAAAANT

I second this emotion <3


ambitiousbard:

jessidork:

toastyhat:

awesomephilia:

Reverse gender stereotypes at the gym

Aaahhhh get on my dash you amusing thing you.

I kinda love it

this is actually great from an acting perspective.

the actors actually played the opposite gender instead of just relying on stereotypes (ironically enough) to portray that they were, in fact, the opposite gender. Usually if you tell a guy to act like a girl, he begins playing by the homosexual stereotype (faking a lisp, popping the hip, etc.) and while it accentuates femininity, it’s really uncomfortable and forced, making it just seem like he’s playing a stereotype instead of the actual gender. And girls will do this too; being told to play a male and instead just deepening the voice and say “dude” and “bro” a lot (although these are more common among modern practices).

The males played up femininity without coming off as a forced stereotype and the females played up masculinity and machismo without forcing their performance.

also the video is funny and I kind of forgot the point I was making.


Track Title: I Was Lost Without You

Artist: Sam Hulick

what-a-kick-in-the-quad:

anoia:

xiokosh:

Playing “i Was Lost Without You” faster gives it a completly other mood.

image

I was just thinking about if this was coming back or not.



[x]


acodanies:

roboboners:

miserability:

what the fuck

if i ever neglect to reblog this assume i’m dead

oh it’s my favourite video in the world on my dash again